COMMISSIONERS MINUTES                                MAY 4, 2009


The Elmore County Commissioners met in regular session on the above date in the Commissioner’s Room, basement of the Elmore County Courthouse, 150 South 4th East, Mountain Home, Idaho.

Present at the meeting were Commissioner Arlie Shaw and Commissioner Connie Cruser. Chairman Larry Rose was absent. Also present was Clerk Marsa Grimmett and Civil Attorney Buzz Grant.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to go into Executive Session pursuant to I.C. 67-2345(b) to discuss a personnel issue.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Motion by Cruser, second by Shaw, to approve the personnel action that was discussed in Executive Session.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser to approve the minutes for April 20, 2009, April 22, 2009 and April 29, 2009.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

The Slash T Rodeo Company letter was discussed. Civil Attorney Grant stated a Rodeo Contract for the Elmore County Fair has been drafted and needs to be delivered to the Company.

Motion by Cruser, second by Shaw, to accept the Rodeo Contract for the Elmore County Fair and have a copy sent to Mr. Gorrell and to the Rodeo Company.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Russell Duke, Director, and Betty Ann Nettleton, Central District Health, appeared before the Commissioners to discuss the 2010 fiscal year proposed budget. Discussion followed on the current Swine Flu outbreak. Mr. Duke explained Central District Health is not asking for any increase in the upcoming budget. Due to programs and expenses being adjusted an increase of $49.00 is all Elmore County’s portion will be. Mr. Duke also stated the population in Elmore County has increased. The current economy was discussed and how it reflects the costs of the Department.

Sheriff Rick Layher joined the meeting.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to go into Executive Session pursuant to I.C. 67-2345(b) to discuss a complaint against the Sheriff’s Department.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Regular session resumed. No action was taken as result of the Executive Session.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to recess as a Board of Commissioners and convene as a Board of Equalization.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Assessor Jo Gridley appeared with the yearly Circuit Breaker applications. Motion by Cruser, second by Shaw, to approve the Circuit Breaker applications.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to recess as a Board of Equalization and re-convene as a Board of Commissioners.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Commissioner Shaw read the Certificates of Residency into the record: Charles Thomas Abrahamson, Lisa Ann Cantrell, Emily Michelle Cook, Glen D. Hance, Ismeal Orozco Hurtado, Ashley Brooke Loftus, Brianna Dawn Loftus, Courtney Charbonneau Loftus, Brandon Raymond Lopez, Rosa Maria Lopez, Joseph Lewis Poseley, Mindy Kay Troutfetter, Janessa R. Walters, and Hanna Joann Zamora. Motion by Cruser, second by Shaw, to approve the Certificates of Residency as read.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Mail delivery was discussed.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to approve the corrected Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law on the Vanilla Sun Subdivision appeal.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

A public hearing date was set for June 8, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. on an application by Stan Scott requesting a rezone of property from Light Industrial to Commercial. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and forwarded their recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners to deny an application to rezone.

A liquor license application for Stew’s Place was discussed. Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to approve the liquor license for Stew’s Place.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to recess for lunch.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to go into Executive Session pursuant to I.C. 67-2345(d) to meet with Social Services Director Marianne Bate to discuss Indigent applications.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Regular session resumed. The following decisions were made as result of the Executive Session.

K-03-09-08 Motion by Cruser, second by Shaw, to approve with a reimbursement order of $200.00 per month with a 90 day review.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Commissioner Shaw read the tax cancellations into the record: No. 994 Abundant Life Christian $1,315.04, No. 995 Roger Saucier $8.02, No. 996 Allan Carroll $8.02, and No. 997 Ron J. Forbis $45.86. Total tax cancellations were 1,376.94. Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to approve the tax cancellations.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Social Services Director Marianne Bate appeared and discussion followed on how Ada County holds their Indigent hearings. In the hearing notice there are instructions to the applicant on how to timely submit exhibits before the hearing.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to go into Executive Session pursuant to I.C. 67-2345(d) to meet with Social Services Director Marianne Bate to discuss an appeal of a reimbursement order.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

A hearing was held on K-02-09-03. Present at the hearing were Commissioner Arlie Shaw, Commissioner Connie Cruser, Clerk Marsa Grimmett, Social Services Director Marianne Bate, Civil Attorney Buzz Grant, and the applicant. Discussion followed on the reimbursement order.

Regular session resumed.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, on case K-02-09-03 to change the reimbursement order to $50.00 with a review in 90 days.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to sign the letter of recommendation for Mountain Home Extrication for a grant application.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

At 3:00 p.m. a public hearing was held to hear testimony on an appeal from the Mountain Home Rural Fire Protection District regarding a decision by the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve an application from Bermensolo, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit for a 4-Lot Letter of Information in an Agriculture B (Ag B) Zone. Site is located in Township 3 South, Range 6 East, Section 34, B.M.. A more common means of locating this site is proceed West on Airbase Road past Highway 51 on the left side of the road approximately ¼ mile. The Mountain Home Rural Fire Protection District is appealing inadequate turn around and road construction for fire suppression.

Chris Alzola, Mountain Home Rural Fire Protection District, appeared and explained why the appeal was filed. The road and turnaround was asked to be longer and larger by the Fire District. The application states the property will be used for residential use, however the applicant states the property will be used for Commercial purposes. The Planning and Zoning Commission did not acknowledge the District’s request to increase the size of the turnaround and that is why the Fire District is appealing the lot splits. Ms. Alzola read from the Findings of Facts from the Growth and Development Department stating it reads: The proposed conditional use will be served adequately by existing essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer or the person responsible for the establishment of the proposed conditional use shall adequately provide any such services. Ms. Alzola stated the Fire District does not feel it will be adequately protected which was reflected at the Planning and Zoning hearing.

Gary Bermensolo, Bermensolo, Inc. appeared before the Board and referenced his letter already submitted in response. Mr. Bermensolo stated the Planning and Zoning Commission stated they were not going to set a precedent of having the road extended all the way to the boundary of the property. If the property does get developed as residential property then a plat would be involved and another look would be taken at the specific requirements. Mr. Bermensolo referenced other examples of lot splits, roads and cul-de-sacs, and none of those were required to extend the road in the fashion the Fire District wants this road to be constructed. Mr. Bermensolo is asking the Board to uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission’s decision.

Former Growth and Development Director Bonnie Sharp stated the decision by the Planning and Zoning Commission was site specific for the property and the uses put forward in the application and that the Commission felt the proposed road and cul-de-sac were adequate.

Chris Alzola, Mountain Home Rural Fire Protection District, stated the application is for residential use, not Commercial use as Mr. Bermensolo is indicating. The Fire District is just asking for adequate access for fire protection.

Ms. Sharp stated the property is currently zoned Agricultural.

Mr. Bermensolo showed the Commissioners a map on Night Sky View Subdivision and that property was not required to have a longer road.

Commissioner Shaw asked Commissioner Cruser if she had any further questions. Commissioner Cruser stated no. Commissioner Shaw closed the public hearing and stated a decision would be made soon.

Mollie Marsh, Director of the Western Elmore County Recreation District, Dave Aizpitarte, Bionomics Environmental, Eagle Idaho, Betty Ashcraft, public liaison for the Western Elmore County Recreation District, Ashley Griggs, Environmental Technician for Bionomics Environmental, Eagle, Idaho and Brian Peterson, Hall Friedly & Ward, representing the Western Elmore County Recreation District. Ms. Ashcraft stated the group was here to discuss Elmore County being the responsible entity for the Western Elmore County Recreation District for the Federal Appropriations Award regarding the environmental assessment. Discussion followed on the particulars of what would be involved in the County being the responsible party. Civil Attorney Grant stated he felt there was an urgency by the Recreation District to get this done. All the parties, including the Commissioners, stated there was no rush. Commissioner Shaw asked why HUD couldn’t be the responsible party. Mr. Peterson replied the responsible party/entity would be in charge of zoning and that is why the County would be responsible. The Recreation District will send the paperwork they have prepared in and have it reviewed. The County will make a decision if they will be the responsible party at a later date after further investigation.

Mary Ann Peterson, 4-H Coordinator, appeared with two students Billy Phillips, Mountain Home, Allison Lewallen, Mountain Home, and Michelle Sharp, Mountain Home. The students gave a brief report on their 4-H activities.

The public portion of the meeting was held. Chris Alzola, Mountain Home, appeared and asked why the County would be the responsible party for the Western Elmore County Recreation District (WECRD). The WECRD asked the City of Mountain Home to be the responsible party and they could not as the property was not within the City limits. Therefore the WECRD came to the County to ask them to be the responsible party. Commissioner Shaw stated regardless of the decision the County will make on this request, in no way does it reflect whether the County is for or against the Recreation District. The cost of the request was discussed and who would be paying for it.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to adjourn.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

At 6:00 p.m. a Public Hearing was held to receive testimony on a revised Zoning and Development Ordinance and revised Future Land Use and Zoning Maps for the unincorporated areas of Elmore County. This Ordinance will affect future land use in the unincorporated areas of Elmore County.

The zones being proposed include General Agriculture (Ag), Rural Residential /Mixed Use (RR/MU), Recreation/Tourism (REC), Neighborhood Commercial (C1), Highway/Interstate Commercial (C2), Light Industrial/Manufacturing (M1), Heavy Industrial/Manufacturing (M2), Planned Community (PC), Planned Unit Development (PUD), Planned Unit Development District (PUDD), Public Airport Hazard Zone (PAZ), Air Base Hazard Zone (ABHZ), and Air Base Commercial Zone (ACZ). Each of these zones will have specific regulations regarding type of development, density of development, lot size, set backs from property lines, height, and lot width to depth ratio.

Former Growth and Development Director Bonnie Sharp reviewed the changes in the proposed ordinance from the last public hearing:

Chapter 17, page 6, E, 3a will read: a. Private roads shall be completed within two (2) years following the acceptance and approval of the roadway design by the Growth and Development Department. The roadway design will be submitted to the Growth and Development Department by a licensed engineer.

The following definitions were changed to read:

Industrial/Manufacturing Use, Heavy will read: Refers to the manufacture, processing and testing of goods and materials or products predominately from extracted or raw materials, or a use engaged in storage of such materials. Heavy Industrial includes manufacturing processes that use flammable or explosive materials, or storage of materials that potentially involve hazardous or commonly recognized offensive conditions. Heavy Industrial uses include those uses which require large amounts of water or where the by-products of such use (such as noise, smoke, odor, glare, gas, or heavy vehicle use) are present or generated. The underlined portion was added as suggested by Civil Attorney Grant.

Industrial/Manufacturing Use, Light will read: Refers to the manufacture, processing, and testing of goods and materials from previously prepared materials, of finished products or parts, including processing, fabrication, assembly, treatment, packaging, incidental storage, sales, and distribution of such products. Light Industrial includes uses and operations that do not directly adversely affect nearby land uses. Light Industrial uses include a wide variety of enterprises that do not cause noxious odors or noise or use large amounts of water.

In Chapter 8, page 3 of 136, under 6-8-97 it was changed to read Energy Production (<25kW), Home Use.

The following changes were made to the Land Use Table Matrix:

Every land use allowed in the M2 Zone will require a conditional use permit.

Advertising, Signs & Structures, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AA/C to C.
Archery Range/Indoors, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Brewery or Distillery, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Cabinet Manufacturing, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Composting Facility, Commercial, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Concrete Batch Plant, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Contractors Yard, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Dairy Products Processing, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Energy Production (<25kW), Home Use, under Ag the allowed use was changed from C to AU, under REC it was changed from X to AU, under RR/MU it was changed from X to AU, under M1 it was changed from C to X, and under M2 it was changed from C to X.
Energy Production Facilities, under Ag the allowed use was changed from C to X, under M1 it was changed from C to X.
Equipment Rental-Sales Yard Including Farm Equipment, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Food Processing and Packaging Plant, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Freight or Truck Terminal, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Furniture Refinishing, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
A new line was added for Industrial/Manufacturing Facility, Heavy which lists Ag as an X, REC as an X, RR/MU as an X, C1 as an X, C2 as an X, M1 as an X, M2 as a C, PAZ as an X, ABHZ as an X and ACZ as an X.
A new line was added for Industrial/Manufacturing Facility, Light which lists Ag as an X, REC as an X, RR/MU as an X, C1 as an X, C2 as a C, M1 as a C, M2 as a C, PAZ as a C, ABHZ as an X, and ACZ as an X.
Lumber Yard-Retail/Wholesale, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Machine Shop, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Office, Temporary Construction, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AA to C.
Sawmill or Planing Mill, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AU to C.
Tower, Antenna or Structure, Commercial, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AA to C.
Truck and Trailer Stop and/or Wash, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AA to C.
Wireless Communication Facility, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AA to C.
Wrecking Yard, under M2 the allowed use was changed from AA to C.

Energy Production Facility, page 29, is only allowed in Heavy M2 Zone.

The following was added: Chapter 8, page 96 of 136, Section 6-8-134: Industrial/Manufacturing Facility, Heavy:

A. A facility that manufactures, processes, and tests goods and materials predominately from extracted or raw materials, or a use engaged in storage of such materials shall be considered a heavy industrial/manufacturing facility.

The following was added: Chapter 8, page 96 of 136, Section 6-8-135: Industrial/Manufacturing Facility, Light:

A. A facility that manufactures, processes, and tests goods and materials from previously prepared materials, of finished products or parts, including processing, fabrication, assembly, treatment, packaging, incidental storage, sales, and distribution of such products shall be considered a light industrial/manufacturing facility.

The required findings are as follows:

1. The proposed use shall, in fact constitute a Conditional Use Permit as determined in Chapter 8, Table 6-8-11 ( C), Elmore County Land Use Table, as contained in this Ordinance;

2. The proposed use shall be in harmony with and in accordance with the Elmore County Comprehensive Plan and this Ordinance (Title 6);
3. The proposed use complies with the purpose statement of the applicable base zone and with the specific use standards as set forth in this Chapter;

4. The proposed use shall comply with all applicable County Ordinances;

5. The proposed use shall comply with all applicable State and Federal regulations;

6. The proposed us shall be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained in such a way as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity; and that such use shall not change the essential character of said area;

7. The proposed use shall not be hazardous or disturbing to existing neighboring uses or impede their normal development;

8. The proposed use shall be served adequately by available public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer, or that the person responsible for the establishment of the proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services;

9. The proposed use shall not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and the proposed use shall not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the County;

10. The proposed use shall not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;

11. The proposed use shall have vehicular approaches which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public or private roadways;

12. The proposed use shall not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance.

Colonel Jeff Maxwell, Mission Support Group Commander at Mountain Home Air Force Base, appeared and thanked the Board for their outstanding support of the Air Force Base.

Cashia Brown, Mountain Home, appeared and asked what a performance security bond was. Ms. Brown stated protection is needed in case of any catastrophic events that could happen in the County. The definition of heavy and light industrial, production of power should be included in both of those definitions.

Civil Attorney Buzz Grant explained what a performance bond was for.

Justin Brown, Mountain Home, appeared and stated there was no mention of spot zoning. Mr. Brown would like spot zoning controls added to the ordinance before it is approved.

Dorian Duffin, Hammett, appeared and thanked the Commissioners for adding protection to farm land in the County. Mr Duffin had two suggestions, applicants for electrical generation facilities and energy production facilities are currently required to notify owners within one mile of the proposed facility and he would like all adjacent landowners and those within a 5 mile radius be notified. The second suggestion was electrical generating facilities setbacks be extended to 1 mile.

Chris Alzola did not speak.

Bill Belknap, Prairie, appeared and spoke about the recreation designation. Mr. Belknap would hate to see a developer come in change the area. Mr. Belknap stated the area should remain and agricultural area.

Tracy Lauric, Mountain Home, appeared and asked if public hearings will be required on conditional use permits. The Commissioners answered yes.

Luther Cook, Prairie, appeared and asked about the recreation designation in the Ordinance.

Dave Wroblewski did not speak.

Former Growth and Development Director Bonnie Sharp read the definition of a recreation and tourism district. Growth and Development Director Brent Butler spoke regarding the recreation district and assessed value. There would be no change in the tax assessment as the property is assessed on use, not on zoning. That does not mean assessments won’t go up or down depending on market values.

Nick Nettleton, Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman, explained that the Prairie area is in a recreational overlay and that does not affect the agricultural use in that area.

General discussion followed on the issue.

Motion to accept the changes in the Zoning and Development Ordinance that Ms. Sharp read in the record.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

Motion by Shaw, second by Cruser, to adopt the Zoning and Development Ordinance.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

The Ordinance will be published on May 13, 2009 and that will be the date the Ordinance will be effective.

Chairman Shaw closed the hearing.

Motion by Cruser, second by Shaw, to adjourn.
ROSE - ABSENT
SHAW - AYE
CRUSER - AYE Motion carried and so ordered.

/S/ LARRY E. ROSE, Chairman
ATTEST: /S/ MARSA GRIMMETT, Clerk